Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2013; 19(4): 431-439
Published online Jan 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.431
Published online Jan 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.431
Technology | Advantages | Disadvantages | Human studies |
CathCam | Disposable; peak force reduction with respect to standard colonoscope | No instrument channel; no steering | No |
Aer-O-Scope™ | Disposable; “tip pulling” locomotion; computer-aided control | No instrument channel; no steering | Yes[18] |
Endotics™ | Disposable; Steerable head; “tip pulling” locomotion; computer-aided control; thin tail | No instrument channel; average procedure time longer than colonoscopy | Yes[20,21] |
NeoGuide™ | Instrument channel; shape retention; 3D map of the device; computer-aided control | Reusable (need for cleaning); large diameter | Yes[11] |
Invendoscope™ | Disposable; instrument channel; “tip pulling” locomotion; computer-aided control | Diameter similar to a colonoscope | Yes[24,25] |
ColonoSight™ | Disposable; instrument channel; “tip pulling” locomotion | Diameter similar to a colonoscope | Yes[26] |
Magnetic endoscopic device | Instrument channel; “tip pulling” locomotion; computer-aided control; thin tail | Complexities related to magnetic control | No |
Endo-Ease™ | Facilitates cecal intubation | Large diameter | Yes[29] |
ScopeGuide™ | 3D real-time visualization of the device | Standard colonoscope | Yes[32,33] |
- Citation: Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(4): 431-439
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i4/431.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.431