SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: High risk of migration in the covered stent group

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 37

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

347

HTML

3134

Figures (1-3)

174

Tables (1-3)

200

Sum=3855

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

844

Download

746

Sum=1590

Oct 7, 2013 (publication date) through Jul 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2013; 19(37): 6199-6206
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 The treatment algorithm for self-expanding metal stents placement. SEMS: Self-expanding metal stents; cSEMS: Covered SEMS.

Citation: Waidmann O, Trojan J, Friedrich-Rust M, Sarrazin C, Bechstein WO, Ulrich F, Zeuzem S, Albert JG. SEMS vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: High risk of migration in the covered stent group. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(37): 6199-6206
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i37/6199.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199