Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2013; 19(37): 6199-6206
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199
Table 2 Complications n (%)
| Complications | SEMS | cSEMS | P value |
| Duration of procedure (min), median (range) | 60 (40-121) | 60 (31-160) | 0.867 |
| Migration | 0 (0) | 9 (56) | 0.002 |
| Time until migration (d), mean ± SD (range) | - | 30 ± 52 (1-161) | NA |
| Tumor overgrowth | 3 (19) | 2 (13) | 0.725 |
| Tumor ingrowth, n | 0 | 0 | NA |
| Time until tumor overgrowth (d), mean ± SD (range) | 143 ± 95 (39-224) | 96 ± 105 (22-170) | 0.572 |
| Overall survival (d), median, range | 40 (3-275) | 75 (11-426) | 0.431 |
-
Citation: Waidmann O, Trojan J, Friedrich-Rust M, Sarrazin C, Bechstein WO, Ulrich F, Zeuzem S, Albert JG. SEMS
vs cSEMS in duodenal and small bowel obstruction: High risk of migration in the covered stent group. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(37): 6199-6206 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i37/6199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6199