Comparison of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma using multidetector-row computed tomography

doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5713

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 34

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5286)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

386

HTML

2794

Figures (1-5)

229

Tables (1-1)

223

Sum=3632

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

927

Download

727

Sum=1654

Sep 14, 2013 (publication date) through Jan 24, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (8)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2013; 19(34): 5713-5719
Published online Sep 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5713

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Time attenuation curve of the 67 adenocarcinomas (A) and 6 acinar cell carcinomas (B). Peak enhancement is seen during the delayed phase for all 67 acinar cell carcinomas. Meanwhile, peak enhancement is seen during the portal venous phase for 4 acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs) and during the arterial phase for 2 ACCs. None of the 6 ACCs show peak enhancement during the delayed phase. AC: Adenocarcinomas; CT: Computed tomography; NS: Not significant.

Citation: Sumiyoshi T, Shima Y, Okabayashi T, Kozuki A, Nakamura T. Comparison of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma using multidetector-row computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(34): 5713-5719
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i34/5713.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5713