Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2013; 19(29): 4808-4817
Published online Aug 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4808
Published online Aug 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4808
Ref. | Study design | Imaging | Population | n (M/F) | Results | |||
TP | FP | FN | TN | |||||
Stollfuss et al[32] | NR | PET | Suspected PC or CP | 73 (54/19) | 41 | 3 | 2 | 27 |
Wang et al[33] | NR | PET | Pancreatic mass | 40 (27/13) | 26 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Rose et al[34] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 65 (NR) | 48 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
Kauhanen et al[18] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 38 (19/19) | 17 | 3 | 1 | 17 |
Herrmann et al[35] | P | PET | Suspected PC or CP | 41 (27/14) | 30 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
PET/CT | 31 (NR) | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |||
Nakamoto et al[36] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 47 (31/16) | 22 | 3 | 5 | 17 |
Friess et al[37] | P | PET | Suspected PC or CP | 74 (57/17) | 41 | 4 | 1 | 28 |
Keogan et al[38] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 37 (22/15) | 22 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
Koyama et al[39] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 86 (50/36) | 53 | 4 | 12 | 17 |
Nishiyama et al[19] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 86 (64/22) | 49 | 11 | 6 | 20 |
Inokuma et al[40] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 46 (25/21) | 33 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
Bares et al[20] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 40 (25/15) | 25 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
Van et al[41] | NR | PET | Suspected PC or CP | 109 (65/44) | 29 | 10 | 3 | 67 |
Zimny et al[42] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 106 (NR) | 63 | 5 | 11 | 27 |
Kato et al[43] | NR | PET | Patients with PC or CP | 24 (20/4) | 14 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Ruf et al[21] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 32 (20/12) | 14 | 10 | 1 | 7 |
Rasmussen et al[44] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 20 (12/8) | 9 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Delbeke et al[45] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 65 (33/32) | 52 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
Farma et al[46] | R | PET/CT | Suspected PC | 82 (43/39) | 58 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
Borbath[25] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 59 (29/30) | 42 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Sendler et al[47] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 42 (21/21) | 22 | 4 | 9 | 7 |
Bang et all[48] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 102 (76/26) | 90 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
Papós et al[49] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 22 (13/9) | 6 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
Rajput et al[50] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 11 (NR) | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Ho et al[51] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 14 (7/7) | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
Mertz et al[52] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 35 (NR) | 27 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
Takanami et al[53] | R | PET/CT | Suspected PC | 16 (13/3) | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
Sperti et al[54] | P | PET | Suspected PC | 64 (33/31) | 24 | 1 | 2 | 37 |
Tann et al[55] | R | PET | Suspected PC | 30 (16/14) | 4 | 8 | 3 | 15 |
PET/CT | 30 (16/14) | 6 | 2 | 1 | 21 | |||
Bares et al[56] | NR | PET | Suspected PC | 15 (11/4) | 12 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
- Citation: Wang Z, Chen JQ, Liu JL, Qin XG, Huang Y. FDG-PET in diagnosis, staging and prognosis of pancreatic carcinoma: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(29): 4808-4817
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i29/4808.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4808