Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2013; 19(26): 4209-4213
Published online Jul 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4209
Published online Jul 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4209
Table 2 Patient outcomes
LESSC (n = 298) | TPLC (n = 315) | P value | |
Conversions to open surgery | 2 | 2 | 1.0000 |
EBL (mL) | 14 ± 6.0 | 15 ± 4.0 | 0.2643 |
Gallbladder perforation during surgery | 56 | 6 | < 0.001 |
Operating time (min) | 54.8 ± 11.0 | 33.5 ± 9.0 | < 0.001 |
Operating time of the last 100 cases (min) | 34.3 ± 6.0 | 32.7 ± 8.7 | 0.1589 |
VAS (1–10) | |||
8 h after surgery | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 1.0000 |
Day 1 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | 0.2042 |
Complications | |||
Contusion at incision | 19 | 25 | 0.4540 |
Hematoma at incision | 11 | 19 | 0.1790 |
Hospital stay (d) | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.0000 |
Cosmetic result | 98% | 85% | 0.0010 |
Total cost (USD) | 1933.7 ± 64.4 | 1874.7 ± 46.2 | < 0.0010 |
Total cost of the last 100 cases (USD) | 1881.3 ± 32.8 | 1876.2 ± 33.4 | 0.0571 |
-
Citation: Cheng Y, Jiang ZS, Xu XP, Zhang Z, Xu TC, Zhou CJ, Qin JS, He GL, Gao Y, Pan MX. Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy
vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A large-scale retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(26): 4209-4213 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i26/4209.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4209