Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2013; 19(25): 3996-4000
Published online Jul 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3996
Table 3 Evaluation of each session n (%)
Diarrheal disease1 (poor)2345 (excellent)
Case presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (2)25 (58)17 (40)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)21 (53)19 (48)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)7 (18)16 (41)16 (41)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)19 (49)19 (49)
GI emergencies
Case presentation0 (0)1 (3)2 (6)20 (59)11 (32)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)2 (6)21 (62)11 (32)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)4 (11)17 (47)15 (42)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)19 (51)16 (43)
Malnutrition
Case presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)29 (73)10 (29)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)22 (55)17 (43)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)3 (8)11 (64)11 (28)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)2 (5)24 (60)14 (35)
Oesophageal diseases
Case presentation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)6 (30)14 (70)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)9 (45)11 (55)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)11 (55)9 (45)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)9 (45)11 (55)
Abdominal pain
Case presentation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)6 (30)14 (70)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)5 (25)14 (70)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)4 (20)15 (75)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)5 (25)15 (75)
Hepatology
Case presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)7 (33)13 (62)
Knowledge0 (0)0 (0)2 (10)7 (33)12 (57)
Clarity0 (0)0 (0)1 (3)12 (57)8 (38)
Mode of presentation0 (0)0 (0)1 (5)7 (33)13 (62)
Participants graded sessions from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on quality of case presentations, knowledge, clarity and mode of presentation.