Minireviews
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2013; 19(24): 3726-3746
Published online Jun 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3726
Table 4 Studies evaluating the clinical application of faecal calprotectin in the setting of small-bowel capsule endoscopy
Ref.CountryCentreStudy typeDesignParticipantsFCCEObjective(s)Outcome(s)
Goldstein et al[41]United StatesMulti-centreProspectiveDouble-blind, triple-dummy, placebo controlled334 healthy subjectsN/AM2A®; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, IsraelEvaluate incidence of SB injury and correlation with FC in healthy subjects on celecoxib or ibuprofen + omeprazole►Mean increase in FC higher in subjects on ibuprofen+omeprazole compared with celecoxib alone (P < 0.001);
►No correlation between FC and SB mucosal breaks
Hawkey et al[42]Germany, United KingdomMulti-centreProspectiveDouble-blind, double-dummy, placebo controlled139 healthy subjectsPhical Calprotectin Test Kit NovaTec Immunodiagnostica, GmbH Dietzenbac, GermanyM2A®; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, IsraelInvestigate SB injury lumiracoxib reduces vs naproxen + omeprazole►More SB mucosal breaks on naproxen+omeprazole (77.8% vs 40.4%, P < 0.001);
►Furthermore, higher FC vs placebo (96.8 vs 14.5 μg/g, P < 0.001);
►27.7% on lumiracoxib had SB mucosal breaks (vs placebo, P = 0.196; vs naproxen, P < 0.001)
►No increase in FC (-5.7 μg/g; vs placebo, P = 0.377; vs naproxen, P < 0.001)
Smecuol et al[43]Argentina, Spain, CanadaMulti-centreProspectiveNon-blinded study20 healthy subjectsCalprest® Eurospital SpA, Trieste, ItalyM2A®; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, IsraelDetermine SB damage by low-dose ASA (on a short-term basis)►Short-term administration of low-dose ASA associated with mucosal abnormalities of the SB mucosa;
►Median baseline FC (6.05 μg/g; range: 1.9-79.2 μg/g) increased significantly after ASA use
Werlin et al[44]United States, Israel, United KingdomMulti-centreProspectiveN/A42 pts with CF* (aged 10-36 yr); 29 had pancreatic insufficiencyCalprest® Eurospital SpA, Trieste, ItalyPillCam®SB; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, IsraelExamine the SB of pts with CF without overt evidence of GI disease using CE►Varying degrees of diffuse areas of inflammatory findings in the SB: oedema, erythema, mucosal breaks and frank ulcerations;
►No adverse events recorded;
FC markedly high in pts with pancreatic insufficiency, 258 μg/g (normal < 50)
Koulaouzidis et al[45]United KingdomSingle centreRetrospectiveChart review70 pts with suspected CD and (-) ve bi-directional endoscopyCALPRO NovaTec Immunodiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbac, Germany(1) PillCam®SB; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, Israel; (2) MiroCam®; IntroMedic Co., Seoul, South KoreaValue of FC as selection tool for further investigation of the SB with SBCE, in a cohort of pts with suspected CD►FC = 50-100 μg/g: normal SBCE, despite symptoms suggestive of IBD;
►FC > 100 μg/g: good predictor of positive SBCE;
►FC > 200 μg/g: associated with higher SBCE DY (65%); confirmed CD in 50%;
►Measurement of FC prior SBCE: useful tool to select patients for referral. If FC < 100 μg/g: SBCE is not indicated (NPV 1.0)
Jensen et al[46]DenmarkSingle centreProspectiveBlinded study83 pts from GI OPD clinics with suspected CDCalprotectin ELISA, BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Basel, SwitzerlandPillCam®SB; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, IsraelDetermine FC levels in CD restricted to SB compared to colonic CD, in pts on first diagnostic work-up; Assess the Sens and Spec of FC in suspected CD►In pts with SB or colonic CD FC is equal: median 890 μg/g vs 830 mg/kg, respectively (P = 1.0);
►FC cut-off = 50 μg/g: 92% and 94% Sens for SB and colonic CD, respectively;
►Overall, Sens and Spec for FC: 95% and 56%;
►CD was ruled out with NPV of 92%;
►In suspected CD, FC is effective marker to r/o CD and select patients for endoscopy
Koulaouzidis et al[47]United KingdomSingle centreRetrospectiveChart review49 pts; known or suspected CDCALPRO NovaTec Immunodiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbac, GermanyPillCam®; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, Israel; MiroCam®; IntroMedic Co., Seoul, South KoreaAssess performance of 2 SBCE inflammation scoring systems (LS and CECDAI) correlating them with FC; Define threshold levels for CECDAI►LS performs better than CECDAI in describing SB inflammation, especially at FC < 100 μg/g
►CECDAI levels of 3.8 and 5.8 correspond to LS thresholds of 135 and 790, respectively
Sipponen et al[48]FinlandSingle centreProspectiveBlinded study84 pts; known or suspected CDCalprest® Eurospital SpA, Trieste, ItalyPillCam®; Given®Imaging, Yokneam, Israel; MiroCam®; IntroMedic Co., Seoul, South KoreaStudy the role of FC and S100A12 in predicting SB inflammatory lesions►CE abnormal in 35/84 (42%) pts: 14 CD, 8 NSAID-enteropathy, 8 angioectasias, 4 polyps/tumours, 1 ischemic stricture
►Median FC/S100A12: 22 μg/g (range: 2-342 μg/g)/0.048 μg/g (range: 0.003-1.215 μg/g)
►FC significantly higher in CD pts (median 91, range: 2-312) compared with pts with normal CE or other abnormalities (P = 0.008)
►Faecal S100A12 (0.087 μg/g, range: 0.008-0.896 μg/g): no difference between the groups (P = 0.166)
►Sens, Spec, PPV, NPV in detecting SB inflammation; FC (cut-off 50 μg/g): 59%, 71%, 42%, 83%; S100A12 (cut-off 0.06 μg/g): 59%, 66%, 38%, 82%, respectively