Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2013; 19(23): 3672-3677
Published online Jun 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3672
Published online Jun 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3672
Characteristics | LADG (n = 54) | ODG (n = 54) | P value |
Age (yr) | 58.2 ± 11.9 | 58.4 ± 11.6 | 0.93 |
Gender (M/F) | 40/14 | 40/14 | 1.00 |
BMI index (kg/m2) | 22.6 ± 3.2 | 21.6 ± 3.9 | 0.15 |
Complication (Yes/No) | 16/38 | 18/36 | 0.42 |
ASA (I/II) | 24/30 | 24/30 | 1.00 |
Tumor size (cm) | 3.7 ± 1.9 | 3.5 ± 1.5 | 0.17 |
Histology (well/moderate/low/signet ring) | 19/10/14/11 | 19/10/14/11 | 1.00 |
Lymph node metastasis (+/-) | 27/27 | 25/29 | 0.85 |
TNM stage (IA/IB/II/IIIA/IIIB) | 22/8/9/10/15 | 22/8/9/10/15 | 1.00 |
- Citation: Wang W, Chen K, Xu XW, Pan Y, Mou YP. Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(23): 3672-3677
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i23/3672.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i23.3672