Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2013; 19(22): 3385-3396
Published online Jun 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3385
Published online Jun 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3385
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
Retroviral vectors | High efficiency | Genome integration, dividing target cells needed | [7-9,32,41,42] |
Lentiviral vectors | High efficiency, target cells need not be dividing | Genome integration | [47-49] |
Lentiviral vectors with Cre/Lox | High efficiency | Minimize genomic integration | [43,44] |
Piggyback transposon | Precise deletion is possible | Minimize genomic integration, laborious | [45,46] |
Viral vectors | No genome integration | Low efficiency | [34-37] |
Adenoviral vectors | |||
Sendai vectors | |||
DNA vectors | |||
Plasmid vectors | |||
Episomal vectors | |||
Minicircle vectors | |||
Protein transduction | No genome integration | Low efficiency | [38] |
Small molecules | No genetic modification | Low efficiency | [39] |
Synthetic mRNA | No genetic modification, high efficiency | Multiple rounds of transfection are needed | [40] |
- Citation: Rao MS, Sasikala M, Reddy DN. Thinking outside the liver: Induced pluripotent stem cells for hepatic applications. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(22): 3385-3396
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i22/3385.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3385