Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2013; 19(19): 2864-2882
Published online May 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864
Published online May 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864
Methods of causality assessment | Specific criteria of various causality assessment methods | |||||
Expert based | Structured | Qualitative | Quantitative | Liver specific | Liver validated | |
Prospective evaluation | ||||||
CIOMS scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
MV scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Naranjo scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
KL method | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
Ad hoc approach | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Retrospective evaluation | ||||||
DILIN method | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
WHO method | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
Expert opinion | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
- Citation: Teschke R, Frenzel C, Schulze J, Eickhoff A. Herbal hepatotoxicity: Challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(19): 2864-2882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i19/2864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864