Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2013; 19(17): 2704-2708
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704
Group A (medical adhesive group) | Group B(control group) | P value | |
Incidence of delayed bleeding | 0.00% | 4.88% | 0.035 |
Incidence of perforation | 10.10% | 9.80% | 0.938 |
Location of perforation (n) | |||
Esophageal | 1 | 2 | |
Gastric | 7 | 6 | |
Colorectal | 1 | 0 | |
Perforated lesions | |||
Muscularis propria | 7 | 8 | |
Scar formation | 1 | 0 | |
Non-scar forming lesion | 1 | 0 | |
Incidence of abdominal distension | 13.50% | 12.20% | 0.802 |
With perforation | 8 | 6 | |
Without perforation | 4 | 4 | |
Difficulty excreting adhesive | 2.25% | 0.00% |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Chen Y, Qu CY, Zhou M, Ni QW, Xu LM. Effects of medical adhesives in prevention of complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(17): 2704-2708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i17/2704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2704