Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Ref. | PS freq. | PS technique | Two-step | Efficacy |
Slot et al[1] | 16.5% | PNK | 12% | 99% |
Kasmin et al[14] | 18.0% | PNK | 32% | 93% |
Huigbregtse et al[21] | 19.2% | PNK | 47% | 91% |
Dowsett et al[25] | 12.8% | PNK | 54% | 96.2% |
Shakoor et al[26] | 3.8% | PNK | 13% | 85% |
Leung et al[27] | 3.9% | PNK | 15% | 95% |
Own material | 20.9 % | PNK | 48% | 100% |
14.7% | PCS | 8.5% | 94.4% | |
Binmoeller et al[11] | 38% | PCS | 9% | 100% |
Goff et al[12] | 44.0% | PCS | 14% | 97% |
- Citation: Jamry A. Comparative analysis of endoscopic precut conventional and needle knife sphincterotomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2227.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227