Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227
Table 2 Comparison of the efficacy and complication rates of pre-cut conventional sphincterotomy and pre-cut needle knife procedures
Procedure | PNK (n = 84) | PCS (n = 59) | P value |
Two-step access | 41 | 5 | < 0.0001 |
Efficacy | 84 | 57 | 0.58 |
Amylase level (after 4 h) | |||
> 80 U/L | 41 | 23 | 0.32 |
> 240 U/L | 19 | 11 | 0.71 |
Pancreatic pain (after 24 h) | 13 | 7 | 0.71 |
PEP | 4 | 2 | 0.98 |
“Endoscopic” bleeding | 10 | 8 | 0.97 |
Endoscopic homeostasis | 10 | 7 | 0.79 |
Perforation | 0 | 0 | - |
- Citation: Jamry A. Comparative analysis of endoscopic precut conventional and needle knife sphincterotomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2227-2233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2227.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2227