Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2013; 19(1): 57-64
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.57
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.57
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves for diagnostic accuracy of fatty liver index vs SteatoTest or hepatorenal ultrasound index.
A: SteatoTest; B: Hepatorenal ultrasound index (HRI). Comparing fatty liver index (FLI) to SteatoTest ≥ S2, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). Comparing FLI to HRI ≥ 1.5, AUROC was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87). Receiver operating characteristic curve of sensitivity (true-positive fraction) plotted against 1- specificity (false-positive fraction) of the FLI for diagnosis of steatosis.
- Citation: Zelber-Sagi S, Webb M, Assy N, Blendis L, Yeshua H, Leshno M, Ratziu V, Halpern Z, Oren R, Santo E. Comparison of fatty liver index with noninvasive methods for steatosis detection and quantification. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(1): 57-64
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i1/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.57