Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2012; 18(48): 7296-7301
Published online Dec 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7296
Published online Dec 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7296
Table 3 Comparison of PetCO2 between the two groups
| Time point | CO2 group (mmHg) | Air group (mmHg) | P value |
| Beginning of ESE | 34.01 ± 2.03 | 33.32 ± 2.21 | 0.78 |
| Removal of the tumors | 31.21 ± 2.35 | 30.59 ± 2.73 | 0.73 |
| Wound management | 32.75 ± 2.69 | 32.01 ± 2.22 | 0.92 |
| 10 min after ESE | 33.23 ± 2.56 | 32.61 ± 2.78 | 0.79 |
- Citation: Shi WB, Wang ZH, Qu CY, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Zhou M, Chen Y, Xu LM. Comparison between air and carbon dioxide insufflation in the endoscopic submucosal excavation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(48): 7296-7301
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i48/7296.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7296