Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2012; 18(42): 6088-6095
Published online Nov 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088
Published online Nov 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088
Parameter | SICUS | CTE | ||||
Sens. | Spec. | Accuracy | Sens. | Spec. | Accuracy | |
Strictures | 92 | 0 | 92 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
(TN 0; TP 12; FN 1; FP 0) | (TN 0; TP 13; FN 0; FP0) | |||||
Dilation | 100 | 50 | 85 | 78 | 0 | 82 |
(TN2; TP 9; FN 0; FP2) | (TN 0; TP 7; FN 2; FP 4) | |||||
Fistulae | 60 | 88 | 77 | 60 | 88 | 77 |
(TN 7; TP 3; FN 2; FP 1) | (TN 7; TP 3; FN 2; FP 1) | |||||
Abscesses | 100 | 80 | 85 | 67 | 100 | 85 |
(TN 8; TP 3; FN 0; FP 2) | (TN 9; TP 2; FN 1; FP 1) |
-
Citation: Onali S, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, Zorzi F, Sica G, Fiori R, Ascolani M, Lolli E, Condino G, Palmieri G, Simonetti G, Pallone F, Biancone L. Small intestine contrast ultrasonography
vs computed tomography enteroclysis for assessing ileal Crohn's disease. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(42): 6088-6095 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i42/6088.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088