Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2012; 18(42): 6088-6095
Published online Nov 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088
Published online Nov 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088
Table 3 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of small intestine contrast ultrasonography and computed tomography-enterography for detecting the presence of small bowel abscesses, strictures, fistulae and bowel dilation in Crohn’s disease
Parameter | SICUS | CTE | ||||
Sens. | Spec. | Accuracy | Sens. | Spec. | Accuracy | |
Strictures | 92 | 0 | 92 | 100 | 0 | 100 |
(TN 0; TP 12; FN 1; FP 0) | (TN 0; TP 13; FN 0; FP0) | |||||
Dilation | 100 | 50 | 85 | 78 | 0 | 82 |
(TN2; TP 9; FN 0; FP2) | (TN 0; TP 7; FN 2; FP 4) | |||||
Fistulae | 60 | 88 | 77 | 60 | 88 | 77 |
(TN 7; TP 3; FN 2; FP 1) | (TN 7; TP 3; FN 2; FP 1) | |||||
Abscesses | 100 | 80 | 85 | 67 | 100 | 85 |
(TN 8; TP 3; FN 0; FP 2) | (TN 9; TP 2; FN 1; FP 1) |
-
Citation: Onali S, Calabrese E, Petruzziello C, Zorzi F, Sica G, Fiori R, Ascolani M, Lolli E, Condino G, Palmieri G, Simonetti G, Pallone F, Biancone L. Small intestine contrast ultrasonography
vs computed tomography enteroclysis for assessing ileal Crohn's disease. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(42): 6088-6095 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i42/6088.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6088