Comparative effectiveness of i-SCAN&trade; and high-definition white light characterizing small colonic polyps

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 41

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

380

HTML

3098

Figures (1-1)

225

Tables (1-3)

149

Sum=3852

Nov 7, 2012 (publication date) through Jul 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2012; 18(41): 5905-5911
Published online Nov 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5905

Table 2 Endoscopist quality measures

	Endoscopist A	Endoscopist B
Patients (n)	48 (64)	27 (36)
Polyps/patient (n/n), mean ± SD	1.5 ± 1.7	1.2 ± 1.9
Polyp size (mm), mean ± SD	3.67 ± 1.39	3.77 ± 1.04
Cases in which polyp identified n (%)	29 (60.4)	14 (51.9)
Cases in which adenomatous polyp identified n (%)	22 (45.8)	10 (37.0)
Procedure time (min), mean ± SD	21 ± 6.8^a	26 ± 9.6^a

^aP < 0.05 vs Endoscopist A.

Citation: Chan JL, Lin L, Feiler M, Wolf AI, Cardona DM, Gellad ZF. Comparative effectiveness of i-SCAN™ and high-definition white light characterizing small colonic polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(41): 5905-5911
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i41/5905.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.5905