Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5595-5600
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5595
Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5595
Parameters | n (%) |
Mean tumor diameter | 4.09 ± 2.15 cm |
Tumor diameter in negative margin (n = 22) | 3.80 ± 1.73 cm |
Tumor diameter in positive margin (n = 2) | 7.25 cm |
Histologic grade | |
Well-differentiated | 2 (8.3) |
Moderately-differentiated | 17 (70.8) |
Poorly-differentiated | 5 (20.8) |
T stage | |
T2 | 3 (12.5) |
T3 | 21 (87.5) |
Lymph node metastasis | |
(+) | 17 (70.8) |
(-) | 7 (29.2) |
Vascular invasion | |
(+) | 12 (50) |
(-) | 12 (50) |
Lymphatic invasion | |
(+) | 15 (62.5) |
(-) | 9 (37.5) |
Perineural invasion | |
(+) | 21 (87.5) |
(-) | 3 (12.5) |
Tangential margin | |
(+) | 2 (8.3) |
(-) | 22 (91.7) |
- Citation: Chang YR, Han SS, Park SJ, Lee SD, Yoo TS, Kim YK, Kim TH, Woo SM, Lee WJ, Hong EK. Surgical outcome of pancreatic cancer using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(39): 5595-5600
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i39/5595.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5595