Carbon dioxide accumulation during analgosedated colonoscopy: Comparison of propofol and midazolam

doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5389

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 38

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4163)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

417

HTML

3327

Figures (1-2)

225

Tables (1-3)

194

Sum=4163

Oct 14, 2012 (publication date) through Nov 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (9)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2012; 18(38): 5389-5396
Published online Oct 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5389

Table 3 Procedure outcomes according to the defined endpoints (n)

	Midazolam(n = 42)	Propofol(n = 41)	P value
ΔPcCO₂ < ± 1.5 mmHg (from baseline and five min after end)	12	32	0.0004
SpO₂ < 85%	0	0	NS
SpO₂ < 90%	6	0	0.05
HR < 50 bpm	5	1	NS
Decrease MAP > 25%	17	17	NS

HR: Heart rate; MAP: Mean arterial pressure; SpO₂: Oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry; ΔPcCO₂: Difference of transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension; NS: Not significant.

Citation: Heuss LT, Sugandha SP, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide accumulation during analgosedated colonoscopy: Comparison of propofol and midazolam. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(38): 5389-5396
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i38/5389.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5389