Carbon dioxide accumulation during analgosedated colonoscopy: Comparison of propofol and midazolam

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 38

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

429

HTML

3403

Figures (1-2)

256

Tables (1-3)

215

Sum=4303

Oct 14, 2012 (publication date) through Jan 14, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2012; 18(38): 5389-5396
Published online Oct 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5389

Table 1 Demographic data of the randomized groups

	Sedation with Midazolam(n = 42)	Sedation with Propofol(n = 41)	P value
Age (yr, mean ± SD)	62 ± 13	62 ± 13	NS
M : F (n)	19:23	20:21	NS
ASA I	12 (29%)	13 (32%)	NS
ASA II	16 (38%)	15 (37%)	NS
ASA III	14 (33%)	13 (32%)	NS
Smoker	6 (15%)	6 (15%)	NS
Mean dosage of sedative in mg (range)	5 (4-7)	131 (70-260)	-

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification; NS: Not significant.

Citation: Heuss LT, Sugandha SP, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide accumulation during analgosedated colonoscopy: Comparison of propofol and midazolam. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(38): 5389-5396
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i38/5389.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i38.5389