Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2012; 18(37): 5211-5218
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5211
Figure 3
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. A: Subgroup analysis with patients having a model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) < 10: Significant difference in overall survival relating to indication [refractory ascites (RA) vs variceal bleeding (VB) group, log rank test P = 0.031]; B: Subgroup analysis with patients having a MELD score > 10: No significant difference in overall survival relating to indication (RA vs VB group, log rank test P = 0.274); C: Subgroup analysis with patients with CHILD B or C cirrhosis: Significant difference in overall survival relating to indication (RA vs VB group, log rank test P = 0.021); D: Subgroup analysis with patients age > 65 years: Significant difference in overall survival relating to indication (RA vs VB group, log rank test P = 0.021); E: Subgroup analysis with stent occlusion at first control: No significant difference in overall survival relating to indication (RA vs VB group, log rank test P = 0.289).