Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2012; 18(37): 5249-5259
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5249
Published online Oct 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5249
Study | Procedure | Agent | Absorbed dose or mean activity delivered1 | Number of patients | Response criteria | Response measured at (months post treatment) | Response rate | Complications |
Blanchard et al[49], 1989 | Radioembolization | 90Y plastic microspheres | NA | 15 | WHO | NA | Partial response in 5 (33.3%), minimal response in 2 (13.3%) | Gastritis or gastric ulceration in 6 (in three this was proven to be due to unintended infusion of microspheres into the gastric circulation) |
Andrews et al[50], 1994 | Radioembolization | 90Y glass microspheres | 150 Gy | 24 | WHO | 2 | Partial response in 5 (20.8%), minimal response in 4 (16.7%), stable disease in 7 (29.2%), progressive disease in 8 (33.3%) | Mild gastrointestinal symptoms in 4 (unrelated to treatment) |
Miller et al[7], 2007 | Radioembolization | 90Y glass microspheres | 100-120 Gy | 42 | WHO | 2.32 | Complete/partial response in 8 (19%), stable disease in 22 (52%), progressive disease in 23 | Radiation cholecystitis in 10, liver edema in 18 |
RECIST | 3.92 | Complete/partial response in 10 (24%), stable disease in 21 (50%), progressive disease in 23 | ||||||
Necrosis | 12 | Complete/partial response in 19 (45%) | ||||||
Combined | 1.12 | Complete/partial response in 21 (50%), stable disease in 11 (26%) | ||||||
Sato et al[8], 2008 | Radioembolization | 90Y glass microspheres | 112.8 Gy/1.83 GBq | 137 | WHO | 1-3 | Complete response (2.1%), partial response (40.7%) | Fatigue (56%), vague abdominal pain (26%), nausea (23%) |
Lim et al[51], 2005 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | NA | 46 | RECIST | 2 | Partial response in 12 (27%), stable disease in 12 (27%), progressive disease in 19 (44%) | Between 2 and 8 wk of lethargy, anorexia, nausea and right upper quadrant pain in most patients, severe gastric/duodenal ulceration in 4 (8%), portal hypertension in 1, radiation hepatitis in 1 |
Yu et al[52], 2006 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | 42 Gy | 49 | RECIST | NA | Response rate of 29% | Fatigue in 18 (37%), vague abdominal pain in 10 (20%), nausea/vomiting in 10 (20%), ascites and/or leg edema in 3 (6%) |
Szyszko et al[53], 2007 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | 1.9 GBq | 21 | RECIST | 1-2 | Partial response in 2 (13%), stable disease in 9 (60%), progressive disease in 4 (27%) | NA |
Stuart et al[54], 2008 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | NA | 30 | RECIST | NA | Partial response or stable disease in 14 (47%) | Gastrointestinal ulceration in 1 (3%) |
Kennedy et al[55], 2009 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | 1.1 ± 0.6 GBq | 5023 | RECIST | 3 | Complete response in 23 (4.5%), partial response in 48 (9.5%), stable disease in 386 (76.8%), progressive disease in 45 (9%) | Fatigue and upper abdominal pain (29%), gastritis and overt gastric ulceration (2%), severe liver disease (4%) |
Peynircioğlu et al[43], 2010 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | 1.24 GBq | 10 | RECIST | 1-2 | All patients had at least partial response of the target lesions | Post-procedural mild to moderate fatigue in all patients for 7 d, with mild to moderate fever and abdominal pain in some patients |
Omed et al[56], 2010 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | NA | 11 | RECIST | NA | Partial response (20%), stable disease (50%), progressive disease (30%) | No major complications, 82% of patients experienced side-effects, mainly nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain |
Cianni et al[57], 2010 | Radioembolization | 90Y resin microspheres | 1.64 Gbq | 110 | RECIST | 2 | Complete/partial response in 45, stable disease in 42, progressive disease in 23 | Hepatic failure in 1, gastritis in 6, cholecystitis in 2 |
- Citation: Akhlaghpoor S, Aziz-Ahari A, Amoui M, Tolooee S, Poorbeigi H, Sheybani S. Short-term effectiveness of radiochemoembolization for selected hepatic metastases with a combination protocol. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(37): 5249-5259
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i37/5249.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5249