Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4905-4911
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905
Observer 1 | Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 2 | Observer 3 | Observer 3 | Mean | Mean | |
Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | |
Sensitivity% | 92.6 (25/27) | 92.6 (25/27) | 92.6 (25/27) | 92.6 (25/27) | 85.2 (23/27) | 88.9 (24/27) | 90.1 (73/81) | 91.4 (74/81) |
P value | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
Specificity% | 89.0 (65/73) | 90.4 (66/73) | 87.7 (64/73) | 87.7 (64/73) | 82.2 (60/73) | 90.4 (66/73) | 86.3 (189/219) | 89.5 (196/219) |
P value | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.070 | 0.039 |
- Citation: Kim H, Choi D, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Jo H, Gwak GY, Koh KC, Choi MS, Kim S. High-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment with liver computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(35): 4905-4911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i35/4905.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905