Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4905-4911
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905
Observer 1 | Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 2 | Observer 3 | Observer 3 | Mean | Mean | |
Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | Transverse | 3 MPR | |
ROC Az | 0.947 ± 0.031 | 0.965 ± 0.025 | 0.969 ± 0.024 | 0.959 ± 0.027 | 0.916 ± 0.038 | 0.938 ± 0.033 | 0.946 ± 0.018 | 0.954 ± 0.017 |
95%CI | 0.883-0.982 | 0.908-0.991 | 0.913-0.993 | 0.899-0.988 | 0.843-0.962 | 0.871-0.976 | 0.914-0.968 | 0.924-0.975 |
P value1 | 0.318 | 0.328 | 0.271 | 0.367 | ||||
P value2 | Observer 1-2 | Observer 1-2 | Observer 2-3 | Observer 2-3 | Observer 3-1 | Observer 3-1 | ||
0.368 | 0.782 | 0.099 | 0.461 | 0.35 | 0.334 |
- Citation: Kim H, Choi D, Lee JH, Lee SJ, Jo H, Gwak GY, Koh KC, Choi MS, Kim S. High-risk esophageal varices in patients treated with locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Assessment with liver computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(35): 4905-4911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i35/4905.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4905