Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4823-4854
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4823
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4823
Direct head-to-head comparisons of various anti-TNFs |
Further evidence that treating with anti-TNFs earlier after the diagnosis of CD is better |
Further clarification of the role of using scheduled anti-TNF therapy without concomitant AZA/MTX |
Head-to-head trials comparing the effectiveness of IFX, ADA, and CER peg with conventional therapy in refractory CD (other than newly diagnosed and treatment naive patients) |
Long-term safety |
Evidence for efficacy of switch from ADA → IFX for ADA secondary loss of response |
Optimal therapy for anti-TNF therapy primary non-responders |
The comparison of standard-of-care vs anti-TNF therapy for maintenance therapy in UC |
Are physicians correctly distinguishing mild from moderate or severe CD? |
What is the profile of the patient who is most likely to respond? Are they genotypic or phenotypic characteristics? |
When is the optimal time in the course of the patient’s illness to begin anti-TNF therapy? |
- Citation: Thomson AB, Gupta M, Freeman HJ. Use of the tumor necrosis factor-blockers for Crohn's disease. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(35): 4823-4854
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i35/4823.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4823