Guidelines For Clinical Practice
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4823-4854
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4823
Table 38 Some of the important anti-tumor necrosis factor studies still to be reported
Direct head-to-head comparisons of various anti-TNFs
Further evidence that treating with anti-TNFs earlier after the diagnosis of CD is better
Further clarification of the role of using scheduled anti-TNF therapy without concomitant AZA/MTX
Head-to-head trials comparing the effectiveness of IFX, ADA, and CER peg with conventional therapy in refractory CD (other than newly diagnosed and treatment naive patients)
Long-term safety
Evidence for efficacy of switch from ADA → IFX for ADA secondary loss of response
Optimal therapy for anti-TNF therapy primary non-responders
The comparison of standard-of-care vs anti-TNF therapy for maintenance therapy in UC
Are physicians correctly distinguishing mild from moderate or severe CD?
What is the profile of the patient who is most likely to respond? Are they genotypic or phenotypic characteristics?
When is the optimal time in the course of the patient’s illness to begin anti-TNF therapy?