Guidelines For Clinical Practice
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4823-4854
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4823
Table 33 Meta-analysis of efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy to induce remission or to prevent relapse in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis
Induce remission (RR of not being in remission on active therapy)Prevent relapse (RR of relapse)
CDAZA/6-MP vs placebo/no therapy0.87 (95%CI: 0.71-1.06)0.64 (95%CI: 0.34-1.23)
If OR was used rather than RRs as the summary statistic, then “the result was significant, using a random effects model (OR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.2-0.89)There was no statistically significant benefit for continuing AZA to prevent CD relapse (RR = 0.39; 95%CI: 0.21-0.74)
MTX vs placebo0.82 (95%CI: 0.65-1.03), no statistically significant benefitIM MTX: 0.57 (95%CI: 0.35-0.94); NNT = 4 (95%CI: 2-25) to prevent one relapse
If or used, then the result was statistically significant: OR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.23-0.99PO MTX to facilitate steroid withdrawal: 0.82 (95%CI: 0.58-1.17)
Cyclosporine vs placebo (only one trial)0.84 (95%CI: 0.62-1.07; tacrolimus, one study, no improvement: RR = 0.64; 95%CI: 0.44-0.92)0.96 (95%CI: 0.77-1.20)
UCAZA vs placebo0.85 (95%CI: 0.71-0.01, P = 0.07)0.60 (95%CI: 0.37-0.95, P = 0.03); NNT = 4, 95%CI: 2-10)
MTX vs placebo0.59 (95%CI: 0.04-7.90)