Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2012; 18(33): 4604-4609
Published online Sep 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4604
Published online Sep 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4604
n = 24 | Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | INR | Prothrombin activity (%) | Blood creatinine (μmol/L) | MELD score | HBV DNA loads (copies log10/mL) | Treatment course (d) | Mortality (%) |
High model (n = 24) | ||||||||
Before treatment | 563.8 ± 163.0 | 4.14 ± 1.05 | 21.2 ± 5.8 | 124.0 ± 113.1 | 35.97 ± 4.87 | 4.882 ± 1.847 | 17.2 ± 16.5 | 95.83 (23/24) |
Before death | 615.3 ± 216.4 | 4.67 ± 1.71 | 20.0 ± 8.1 | 179.1 ± 129.1b | 40.48 ± 8.17 | 3.685 ± 1.436 | ||
t value | -1.742 | -1.699 | 0.738 | -3.340 | -2.762 | 2.590 | ||
P value | 0.095 | 0.103 | 0.468 | 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.027 | ||
Intermediate model (n = 54) | ||||||||
Before treatment | 444.5 ± 160.3 | 2.56 ± 0.71 | 35.6 ± 12.1 | 70.1 ± 15.8 | 25.87 ± 2.33 | 6.308 ± 1.607 | 54.0 ± 43.2 | 51.85 (28/54) |
After treatment | 409.5 ± 357.7 | 3.23 ± 2.26 | 38.4 ± 24.1 | 93.4 ± 75.8 | 25.82 ± 13.92 | 3.473 ± 2.097b | ||
t value | 0.667 | -2.637 | -1.132 | -2.223 | -0.030 | 8.826 | ||
P value | 0.508 | 0.011 | 0.263 | 0.031 | 0.976 | 0.000 | ||
Low model (n = 31) | ||||||||
Before treatment | 351.9 ± 114.8 | 1.59 ± 0.37 | 56.8 ± 14.1 | 62.5 ± 11.1 | 18.88 ± 2.44 | 5.741 ± 1.734 | 66.1 ± 41.9 | 3.23 (1/31) |
Recovery stage | 102.8 ± 144.4 | 1.55 ± 0.64 | 63.5 ± 18.2 | 67.4 ± 52.6 | 12.39 ± 7.80 | 2.657 ± 1.154 | ||
t value | 7.065 | 0.411 | -2.468 | -0.526 | 4.860 | 9.332 | ||
P value | 0.000 | 0.684 | 0.020 | 0.603 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Yan Y, Mai L, Zheng YB, Zhang SQ, Xu WX, Gao ZL, Ke WM. What MELD score mandates use of entecavir for ACLF-HBV HBeAg-negative patients? World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(33): 4604-4609
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i33/4604.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4604