Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2012; 18(32): 4363-4370
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363
Nominal correlation | Numerical correlation | ||||
RFS | RSI | RGE | RFS | RSI | |
AET (%) | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
Total reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
Acid reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.05 | NS | NS |
Non-acid reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.05 | NS | NS |
Proximal reflux number | NS | NS | P < 0.04 | NS | NS |
SAP | NS | NS | P < 0.009 | NS | NS |
Gas refluxes | P = 0.028 | NS | NS | P = 0.026 | NS |
Upper endoscopy | NS | P < 0.001 | P = 0.009 | NS | NS |
MII-pH (diagnosis) | NS | NS | P < 0.001 | NS | NS |
- Citation: de Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E, Martinucci I, Bellini M, Fattori B, Ceccarelli L, Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ricchiuti A, Savarino V, Berrettini S, Marchi S. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(32): 4363-4370
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i32/4363.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363