Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2012; 18(3): 268-274
Published online Jan 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.268
Published online Jan 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.268
Table 5 Statistics of sample detection
| Bacterium | Enterococcus | Enterobacterium | Eubacterium | Bifidobacterium | Lactobacillus casei | Lactobacillus acidophilus | |
| Probe | LCR | LDR | LDR | LDR | LCR | LCR | LCR |
| No. of detected sample | 29 | 77 | 42 | 46 | 23 | 80 | 77 |
| Detection rate(%) | 35.37 | 93.90 | 51.22 | 84.15 | 97.56 | 93.90 | |
- Citation: Tang ZR, Li K, Zhou YX, Xiao ZX, Xiao JH, Huang R, Gu GH. Comparative quantification of human intestinal bacteria based on cPCR and LDR/LCR. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(3): 268-274
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i3/268.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.268