Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3571-3577
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3571
Table 2 Comparison of clinicopathologic findings between the high microsatellite instability and non-high microsatellite instability early gastric cancer groups n (%)
MSI-HEGC(n = 73)Non-MSI-H EGC (n = 146)P value
Patients characteristics
Sex0.001
Male37 (50.7)108 (74.0)
Female36 (49.3)38 (26.0)
Age (yr)63.4 ± 10.456.8 ± 11.1< 0.001
Pathologic findings
Size (mm)22.4 ± 15.726.5 ± 13.00.055
Depth of invasion
Mucosa27 (37.0)71 (48.6)0.102
Submucosa46 (63.0)75 (51.4)
Histologic differentiation0.003
(by WHO classification)
Well differentiated tubular24 (32.9)32 (21.9)
Moderately differentiated tubular30 (41.1)48 (32.9)
Poorly differentiated tubular6 (8.2)29 (19.9)
Signet ring cell8 (11.0)43 (24.0)
Mucinous5 (6.8)2 (1.4)
Lauren classification0.017
Intestinal61 (83.6)100 (68.5)
Diffuse12 (16.4)46 (31.5)
Mucinous component7 (9.6)3 (2.1)0.017
No signet ring cell component60 (90.4)116 (79.5)0.041
Co-existing underlying adenoma29 (39.7)29 (19.9)0.002
Lymphovascular invasion17 (23.3)22 (15.1)0.134
Lymph node metastasis12 (16.4)14 (9.6)0.14
Lymphoid stromal reaction0.002
Absent-to-mild49 (74.2)91 (91.9)
Moderate-to-severe17 (25.8)8 (8.1)
Synchronous lesion0.018
Early gastric cancer7 (9.6)5 (4.8)0.11
Adenoma7 (9.6)7 (3.4)0.163