Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: Complications and inflammatory response

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 27

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

338

HTML

3026

Figures (1-1)

232

Tables (1-3)

202

Sum=3798

Jul 21, 2012 (publication date) through Nov 5, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3558-3564
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558

Table 1 Necropsy findings 4 wk after the procedure n (%)

	Laparoscopy	Notes
Adhesions	3 (30)	4 (40)	NS
Abscess	0	1 (10)¹	NS
Peritonitis	0	0	NS
Pigs without any complication	7 (70)	5 (50)	NS

¹Small intramural abscess (8 mm) at the healed gastrotomy site. NS: Not significant.

Citation: Martínek J, Ryska O, Filípková T, Doležel R, Juhas S, Motlík J, Holubová M, Nosek V, Rotnáglová B, Zavoral M, Ryska M. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: Complications and inflammatory response. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3558-3564
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3558.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558