Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551
Procedural indicators | |
Quality indicator sought in the report | n = 250 |
Date of exam | 246 (98.4, 95% CI: 96.8-100.0) |
Medications with dosage | 248 (99.2, 95% CI: 98.1-100.0) |
Level of difficulty | 247 (98.8, 95% CI: 97.4-100.0) |
Bowel preparation quality | |
Poor | 10 (4.0, 95% CI: 1.6-6.5) |
Fair | 27 (10.8, 95% CI: 7.0-14.7) |
Good | 212 (85.1, 95% CI: 80.7-89.6) |
Actual extent of examination | |
Cecum | 236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.7-97.3) |
Ascending colon | 6 (2.4, 95% CI: 0.5-4.3) |
Transverse colon | 2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9) |
Descending colon | 2 (0.8, 95% CI: 0.0-1.9) |
Recto sigmoid | 4 (1.6, 95% CI: 0.0-3.2) |
Cecal intubation | 236 (94.4, 95% CI: 91.5-97.3) |
Photodocumentation | 186 (74.4, 95% CI: 69.0-79.8) |
Documentation of cecal landmarks | |
Appendiceal orifice | 168 (67.2, 95% CI: 61.2-73.2) |
Ileocecal valve | 103 (41.2, 95% CI: 35.1-73.1) |
Retroflexion in rectum | 177 (70.8, 95% CI: 65.1-76.5) |
Withdrawal time | 0 (0) |
Total time | 0 (0) |
Intra-procedural complications | 1 (0.4, 95% CI: 0.0-1.2) |
Colonoscopic findings: polyps | |
Polyp findings | 111 (44.4, 95% CI: 38.2-50.6) |
Mean polyp number | 2.2 ± 2.5 |
Polyp size documented | 73 (65.8, 95% CI: 56.8-74.7) |
Mean polyp size (mm) | 17.6 ± 33.1 |
Morphology | |
Documented | 69 (62.2, 95% CI: 53.0-71.3) |
Pedunculated | 17 (23.9, 95% CI: 13.8-34.1) |
Sessile | 56 (80.0, 95% CI: 70.4-89.6) |
Anatomic location documented | 110 (99.1, 95% CI: 97.3-100.0) |
Method of removal | |
Cold biopsy | 28 (25.2, 95% CI: 17.0-33.4) |
Cold snare | 20 (18.0, 95% CI: 10.8-25.3) |
Snare cautery | 35 (31.5, 95% CI: 22.8-40.3) |
Not mentioned | 23 (20.7, 95% CI: 13.1-28.4) |
Retrieved | 72 (84.7, 95% CI: 76.9-92.5) |
Sent to pathology | 85 (76.5, 95% CI: 67.3-85.7) |
- Citation: Beaulieu D, Barkun A, Martel M. Quality audit of colonoscopy reports amongst patients screened or surveilled for colorectal neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3551-3557
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3551