Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400
Table 3 Per-polyp miss rates for standard colonoscopy and Third Eye colonoscopy by size of adenoma and indication for procedure
| Adenomas missed with standard colonoscopy during 1st exams in group A (%) | Adenomas missed with Third Eye colonoscopy during 1st exams in group B (%) | |||||
| < 10 mm | ≥10 mm | All sizes | < 10 mm | ≥10 mm | All sizes | |
| All indications | 33.8 | 11.8 | 31.4 | 20.8 | 0 | 18.4 |
| Screening | 27.7 | 12.5 | 26.0 | 28.1 | 0 | 23.5 |
| Surveillance | 37.7 | 0 | 35.1 | 16.7 | 0 | 15.5 |
| Diagnostic | 42.9 | 20.0 | 38.5 | 7.1 | 0 | 6.7 |
| Surveillance + diagnostic | 39.2 | 11.1 | 36.1 | 14.7 | 0 | 13.7 |
- Citation: Siersema PD, Rastogi A, Leufkens AM, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, DeMarco DC. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i26/3400.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400