Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400
Table 1 Additional adenoma detection rates for second exams by indication for procedure
| Indication | Group A (SC, then TEC) | Group B (TEC, then SC) | Net additional detection with TEC (%) | ||||
| SC 1st | TEC 2nd | Additional in 2nd exam (%) | TEC 1st | SC 2nd | Additional in 2nd exam (%) | ||
| All indications | 107 | 49 | 45.8 | 115 | 26 | 22.6 | 23.2 |
| Screening | 54 | 19 | 35.2 | 52 | 16 | 30.8 | 4.4 |
| Surveillance | 37 | 20 | 54.1 | 49 | 9 | 18.4 | 35.7 |
| Diagnostic | 16 | 10 | 62.5 | 14 | 1 | 7.1 | 55.4 |
| Surveillance + diagnostic | 53 | 30 | 56.6 | 63 | 10 | 15.9 | 40.7 |
- Citation: Siersema PD, Rastogi A, Leufkens AM, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, DeMarco DC. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(26): 3400-3408
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i26/3400.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400