Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2012; 18(24): 3138-3144
Published online Jun 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138
Published online Jun 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138
Group A (n = 27) | Group B (n = 34) | P value | |
Technical success, n (%) | 27 (100) | 34 (100) | 0.999 |
Hospital stay (d) | 8.52 ± 1.91 | 15.88 ± 6.36 | < 0.001 |
Complications, n (%) | 0.007 | ||
Minor complications | 0.005 | ||
Post-embolization syndrome | 21 (77.8) | 34 (100) | |
Major complications | 0 (0) | 7 (20.6) | 0.014 |
Splenic abscess | 0 | 2 | |
Pleural effusion | 0 | 3 | |
Ascites | 0 | 2 | |
CT follow-up (mo) | 36.44 ± 12.67 | 36.00 ± 11.82 | 0.926 |
Clinical follow-up (mo) | 40.63 ± 12.60 | 40.14 ± 11.58 | 0.965 |
WBC count > 4 × 109/L at 2-year follow-up, n (%) | 27 (100) | 21 (62) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: He XH, Gu JJ, Li WT, Peng WJ, Li GD, Wang SP, Xu LC, Ji J. Comparison of total splenic artery embolization and partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(24): 3138-3144
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i24/3138.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138