Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2012; 18(24): 3138-3144
Published online Jun 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138
Published online Jun 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138
Group A(n = 27) | Group B(n = 34) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 48.48 ± 8.87 | 47.945 ± 7.32 | 0.445 |
Female/male | 11/15 | 14/20 | 0.930 |
Child-Pugh classification, n (%) | 0.441 | ||
A | 19 (70.4) | 23 (676) | |
B | 6 (22.2) | 9 (26.5) | |
C | 2 (7.4) | 2 (5.8) | |
Virus, n (%) | 0.463 | ||
B | 22 (81.5) | 25 (73.5 ) | |
C | 5 (19.5) | 9 (26.5) | |
WBC counts × 109 | 1.50 ± 0.32 | 1.54 ± 0.30 | 0.453 |
PLT counts × 109 | 40.33 ± 6.16 | 39.74 ± 4.63 | 0.574 |
Splenic volume (cm3) | 769.93 ± 61.40 | 745.73 ± 50.09 | 0.201 |
- Citation: He XH, Gu JJ, Li WT, Peng WJ, Li GD, Wang SP, Xu LC, Ji J. Comparison of total splenic artery embolization and partial splenic embolization for hypersplenism. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(24): 3138-3144
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i24/3138.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3138