Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2012; 18(23): 2979-2987
Published online Jun 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979
Published online Jun 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979
Table 3 Diagnostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and conventional imaging modalities for detection of extrahepatic metastases
Lung metastases (n = 23) | Lymph node metastases (n = 22) | Bone metastases (n = 11) | ||||
TP | TN | TP | TN | TP | TN | |
PET (+) | 14 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
Conventional (+) | 23 | 2 | 22 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
PET | Conventional | PET | Conventional | PET | Conventional | |
Sensitivity, % | 60.9 | 100 | 90.9 | 100 | 100 | 63.6 |
Specificity, % | 99.1 | 98.2 | 96.5 | 96.5 | 100 | 96.8 |
Accuracy, % | 92.6 | 98.5 | 95.6 | 97.1 | 100 | 94.1 |
PPV, % | 93.3 | 92 | 83.3 | 84.6 | 100 | 63.6 |
NPV, % | 92.5 | 100 | 98.2 | 100 | 100 | 96.8 |
Comparison of ROC curves | P = 0.000 | P = 0.269 | P = 0.010 | |||
(CI: 0.0888-0.294) | (CI: 0.0481-0.348) |
- Citation: Lee JE, Jang JY, Jeong SW, Lee SH, Kim SG, Cha SW, Kim YS, Cho YD, Kim HS, Kim BS, Jin SY, Choi DL. Diagnostic value for extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma in positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(23): 2979-2987
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i23/2979.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i23.2979