Comparison of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization and unilateral portal vein ligation

doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2371

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 19

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3883)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

332

HTML

3131

Figures (1-5)

228

Tables (1-2)

192

Sum=3883

May 21, 2012 (publication date) through Dec 11, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (13)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2012; 18(19): 2371-2376
Published online May 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2371

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Computed tomography showing a case of liver metastasis where the right hepatic lobe volume rate decreased from 66. 9% to 60.4%. A: Before portal vein ligation (PVL) [right hepatic lobe (RHL) volume rate: 66.9%]; B: After PVL (RHL volume rate: 60.4%); C: The right portal branch was intraoperatively ligated (arrow).

Citation: Iida H, Aihara T, Ikuta S, Yoshie H, Yamanaka N. Comparison of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization and unilateral portal vein ligation. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(19): 2371-2376
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i19/2371.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2371