Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2012; 18(16): 1959-1967
Published online Apr 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1959
Published online Apr 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1959
Figure 3 The pooled data.
A: The spleen-preserving rate of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) was significantly higher than open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) [random effects model, RR 2.380 (1.177, 4.812), P = 0.016, I2 = 73.2%]; B: Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in LDP than in ODP [random effects model, WMD -2.713 (-3.799, 1.628), P = 0.00]; C: The proportion of malignant tumors showed no significant difference between LDP and ODP [fixed effects model, RR 1.036 (0.708, 1.516), P = 0.000, I2 = 0%]. Weights are from random effects analysis. CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean differences.
- Citation: Xie K, Zhu YP, Xu XW, Chen K, Yan JF, Mou YP. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(16): 1959-1967
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i16/1959.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1959