Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2011; 17(8): 1018-1025
Published online Feb 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.1018
Published online Feb 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.1018
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of ultrasound and magnetic resonance enterography regarding bowel wall changes, diagnosis of bowel inflammation, stenosis, abscess, fistula and indirect inflammation signs such as local lymphadenopathy and fat injection or comb sign n (%)
Bowel wall changes | Diagnosis “bowel wall inflammation” | Stenosis | Abscess | Fistula | Local lymph-adenopathy | Mesenteric fat injection/comb sign | |
US = MRE (no pathological change) | 21 (8) | 83 (33) | 150 (60) | 221 (84) | 211 (88) | 187 (75) | 182 (73) |
US = MRE (pathological change) | 163 (65) | 29 (12) | 20 (8) | 9 (4) | 5 (2) | 4 (2) | 4 (2) |
US > MRE | 28 (11) | 6 (2) | 8 (3) | 4 (2) | 2 (1) | 15 (6) | 4 (2) |
MRE > US | 38 (15) | 132 (53) | 72 (29) | 16 (6) | 32 (13) | 44 (18) | 60 (24) |
- Citation: Schreyer AG, Menzel C, Friedrich C, Poschenrieder F, Egger L, Dornia C, Schill G, Dendl LM, Schacherer D, Girlich C, Jung EM. Comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and MR-enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(8): 1018-1025
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i8/1018.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.1018