Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2011; 17(8): 1009-1017
Published online Feb 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i8.1009
Table 3 Odds of having a higher density score in relation to disease subtype and demographic parameters
Diverticula density scoresPredictorsUnivariate analysis
Adjusted analysis - Final model
OR (SE) (95% CI)P valueOR (SE) (95% CI)P value
Higher vs lowerDisease type: RSCDD vs LSDD1.91 (0.41) (1.25, 2.91)0.0032.77 (0.67) (1.39, 3.32)0.001
Asian (vs white)0.59 (0.32) (0.21, 1.70)0.330.47(0.27) (0.16, 1.43)0.18
OB (vs white)0.57 (0.22) (0.27, 1.22)0.150.41(0.17) (0.18, 0.92)0.03
BA (vs white)0.43 (0.22) (0.16, 1.18)0.10.30(0.17) (0.10, 0.88)0.03
Sex (F vs M)0.98 (0.19) (0.67, 1.45)0.92--
Age (proportional odds)1.032 (0.01) (1.01, 1.05)0.0021.04 (0.01) (1.01, 1.06)< 0.001
Post-estimation
BA (vs Asian)0.72 (0.52) (0.17, 3.02)0.660.73(0.47) (0.21, 2.60)0.63
BA (vs OB)0.96 (0.62) (0.27, 3.40)0.950.64 (0.48) (0.15, 2.79)0.55
OB (vs Asian)0.75 (0.47) (0.22, 2.56)0.650.87(0.58) (0.24, 3.21)0.84