Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: A randomized clinical trial

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 5

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

583

HTML

4187

Tables (1-4)

229

Sum=4999

Feb 7, 2011 (publication date) through Jan 9, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2011; 17(5): 671-676
Published online Feb 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671

Table 2 Characteristics of patients and their diagnosis

	Fast track rehabilitation group (n = 106)	Conventional care group (n = 104)	P value
Median age (range, yr)	57 (38-69)	55 (40-67)	0.462
Male/female	65/41	60/44	0.393
Colon/rectum	73/33	63/41	0.110
ASA score			0.384
I	27	32	-
II	60	56	-
III	19	16	-
Operation			0.721
Right hemicolectomy	30	24
Left hemicolectomy	18	26
Sigmoid colectomy	28	32
Anterior resection	30	22
TNM stage			0.741
I	19	17
II	56	61
III	31	26

Citation: Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J, Gong JF, Bao Y, Xie LF, Li JS. Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: A randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(5): 671-676
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i5/671.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671