Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2011; 17(5): 609-617
Published online Feb 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.609
Published online Feb 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.609
Table 3 Analysis of porcine alveolar breath for hydrogen and methane (in ppm - parts per million) before and after the treatment
Group | Hydrogen before | Hydrogen after | Statistical significance | Methane before | Methane after | Statistical significance |
A | N/A | 3.50 ± 2.81 | N/A | N/A | 69.33 ± 56.64 | N/A |
B | 6.0 ± 2.82 | 2.0 ± 0 | NS | 106.50 ± 94.05 | 80.00 ± 48.02 | NS |
C | 1.17 ± 0.41 | 5.0 ± 3.29 | NS | 34.67 ± 25.65 | 66.17 ± 38.83 | NS |
D | 2.0 ± 1.16 | 6.0 ± 6.0 | NS | 60.75 ± 34.77 | 62.00 ± 27.71 | NS |
-
Citation: Bures J, Smajs D, Kvetina J, Förstl M, Smarda J, Kohoutova D, Kunes M, Cyrany J, Tacheci I, Rejchrt S, Lesna J, Vorisek V, Kopacova M. Bacteriocinogeny in experimental pigs treated with indomethacin and
Escherichia coli Nissle . World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(5): 609-617 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i5/609.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.609