Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Primary author | Study design | No. of patients | Cannulation method | Success rate fo biliary cannulation | Incidence fo post-ERCP pancreatitis |
Maeda[8] | RCT | Control (n = 26), attempted PGW (n = 27) | CI | 54%, 93% | 0%, 0% |
Ito[9] | OS | PGW (n = 113) | CI | 73% | 12% |
Herreros de Tejada[10] | RCT | Control (n = 87), attempted PGW (n = 76) | WGC | 56%, 47% | 8%, 17% |
Ito[11] | RCT | PGW with no-PS (n = 35), PGW with PS (n = 35) | CI | 94%, 80% | 23%, 2.9% |
Present study | OS | PGW (n = 142) | CI/WGC (104/38) | 69% (CI 66%, WGC 76%) | 16% (CI 20%, WGC 2.6%) |
- Citation: Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i48/5289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289