Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Model 1 crude OR (95% C.I.) | Model 2adjusted OR (95% C.I.) | Model 3adjusted OR (95% C.I.) | |
CI using a single-lumen catheter | 9.4 (1.2-72)a | 10.2 (1.3-83)a | 10.8 (1.3-88)a |
Female | 1.5 (0.56-3.9) | 1.4 (0.50-3.7) | |
< 50 yr | 6.8 (0.79-59) | 6.1 (0.67-56) | |
Failed cannulation | 1.2 (0.30-4.9) | ||
Bile duct stone removal | 1.9 (0.46-7.5) | ||
Pancreatic brush cytology | 0.55 (0.061-5.0) | ||
Biliary sphincterotomy | 1.3 (0.36-4.7) |
- Citation: Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i48/5289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289