Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Published online Dec 28, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289
Table 1 Patient characteristics and endoscopic procedures used in pancreatic guidewire placement
Total (n = 142) | Cannulation method | |||
CI using a single-lumen catheter (n = 104) | WGC using a double-lumen catheter (n = 38) | P value | ||
Mean age (mean ± SD) | 72.7 (11.5) | 68.5 (10.9) | 75.3 (13.2) | |
Male sex (%) | 71 (50) | 48 (46) | 23 (61) | 0.18 |
Periampullary diverticulum (%) | 28 (20) | 21 (20) | 7 (18) | 1.00 |
Diagnosis (%) | ||||
Choledocholithiasis | 55 (39) | 33 (32) | 22 (58) | 0.01 |
Biliary cancer | 33 (23) | 25 (24) | 8 (21) | 0.90 |
Pancreatic cancer | 24 (17) | 20 (19) | 4 (11) | 0.33 |
Ampullary cancer | 4 (2.8) | 4 (3.8) | 0 (0) | 0.57 |
ERCP maneuvers (%) | ||||
Biliary sphincterotomy | 69 (49) | 50 (48) | 19 (50) | 0.99 |
Transpancreatic sphincterotomy | 2 (1.4) | 1 (0.96) | 1 (2.6) | 0.87 |
Papillary ballon dilatation | 4 (2.8) | 4 (4) | 0 (0) | 0.63 |
Bile duct stone removal | 20 (14) | 14 (13) | 6 (16) | 0.91 |
Biliary stenting | 55 (39) | 36 (35) | 19 (50) | 0.14 |
Pancreatic stenting | 9 (6.3) | 8 (7.7) | 1 (2.6) | 0.50 |
- Citation: Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(48): 5289-5294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i48/5289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289