Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2011; 17(45): 4952-4959
Published online Dec 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i45.4952
Table 3 Treatment sessions of radiofrequency ablation: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance vs conventional B-mode ultrasound guidance
Author[Ref.]YearStudy typen (CEUS/B-mode)Tumor size, (mean, cm)(CEUS/B-mode)Mean treatment sessions (CEUS vs B-mode)P value
Minami et al[12]2004Case control study21/251.7/1.71.05 vs 2.00.002
Minami et al[53]2007RCT19/201.2/1.31.1 vs 1.40.043
Masuzaki et al[36]2010Case control study291/2911.9/1.91.33 vs 1.490.0019