Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2011; 17(42): 4689-4695
Published online Nov 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4689
Published online Nov 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4689
Aronchick scale | |
1 Excellent | Small volume of clear liquid or greater than 95% of surface seen |
2 Good | Large volume of clear liquid covering 5% to 25% of surface but greater than 90% of surface seen |
3 Fair | Some semi-solid stool that could be suctioned or washed away but greater than 90% of surface seen |
4 Poor | Semi-solid stool that could not be suctioned or washed away and less than 90% of surface seen |
5 Inadequate | Repreparation needed |
Residual stool score (total in sum of three score) | |
Amount of residual stool | 0 = none |
1 = small | |
2 = moderate | |
3 = large | |
Consistency of residual stool | 0 = none |
1 = clear liquid | |
2 = colored liquid | |
3 = stool particles | |
4 = semi-solid stool | |
5 = solid stool | |
Percent bowel wall visualized | 0 ≥ 75% |
1 = 50%-75% | |
2 = 25%-49% | |
3 ≤ 25% |
-
Citation: Pontone S, Angelini R, Standoli M, Patrizi G, Culasso F, Pontone P, Redler A. Low-volume plus ascorbic acid
vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(42): 4689-4695 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i42/4689.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i42.4689