Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2011; 17(41): 4554-4562
Published online Nov 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4554
Published online Nov 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4554
Authors | Modality | n | No. of treatment | Power settings | Response rate | Duration of study | Side effects |
Jensen et al[18], 1997 | Heater probe | 12 | 4 (mean) | 10-15 W, 1 s pulses | 12/12 (100%) | 24/12 | None |
Fuentes et al[25], 1993 | Heater probe | 8 | 1-4 | 20 J/pulse | 8/8 (100%) | N/A | None |
Jensen et al[18], 1997 | Bipolar | 9 | 4 (mean) | 10-15 J | 9/9 (100%) | 24/12 | None |
Haulk et al[69], 1996 | Bipolar | 8 | 2-5 W or 11-25 W | 8/8 (100%) | 4/12 | None | |
Mannoury et al[22],1991 | Bipolar | 4 | Setting 5, 2 s pulses | 4/4 (100%) | 9/12 | None |
- Citation: Rustagi T, Mashimo H. Endoscopic management of chronic radiation proctitis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(41): 4554-4562
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i41/4554.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4554